A Lawsuit Against Trump's Wind Directive

A Lawsuit Against Trump's Offshore Wind Directive

On Monday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a new lawsuit against the Trump administration, joining forces with 17 other attorneys general from across the country. The group alleges that the Trump administration's January 20th memorandum attempting to "freeze the development of offshore wind energy" is illegal.

Key Points of the Lawsuit

  • The Trump administration's memorandum halted all federal approvals necessary for the development of offshore and onshore wind energy projects pending federal review.
  • The lawsuit alleges that this directive violates multiple federal laws, including the Administrative Procedure Act.
  • The attorneys general claim that the memorandum hurts their respective states' efforts to develop clean energy, fight pollution, and address climate change.

According to Attorney General Bonta, "The Trump Administration's directive to halt the development of offshore wind energy is illegal. This reckless directive will not only reverse America's progress in clean energy initiatives, but our communities will also suffer the economic consequences of the President's misguided lawlessness."

Affecting California and Other States

California currently has five federal offshore wind leases off its coast, which are designed to bring substantial amounts of clean energy to the grid. These developments could power 1.6 million homes and potentially more.

"The President's directive also jeopardizes substantial economic benefits to California, including the creation of thousands of union jobs, increased tax revenue particularly in the Humboldt area, and the provision of more than $50 million to support communities, Native American Tribes, or other interested parties that are expected to be affected by the lease development."

Attorney General Bonta noted that "the President has promised that his actions would lower energy costs, but instead, energy prices have only gone up and will continue to skyrocket."

A Response from Other States

New York Attorney General Letitia James emphasized the urgency of the matter, stating that the federal government's recent halt of the Empire 1 offshore wind project would "devastate one of our nation's fastest-growing sources of clean, reliable, and affordable energy."

A United Front Against the Trump Administration

  1. The list of attorneys general behind the lawsuit includes Massachusetts, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington.
  2. Many of these states are landlocked with no access to the oceans or Great Lakes, making the fight for offshore wind energy particularly important.

A Response from the Trump Administration

The White House spokesperson defended the memorandum, stating that it would "defend the new federal stance." They also claimed that offshore wind farms stood in the way of high energy production and lower energy prices.

"Instead of working with President Trump to unleash American energy and lower prices for American families, Democrat Attorneys General are using lawfare to stop the President's popular energy agenda," said White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers.

The Lawsuit Heads to Court

The suit will be heard at the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts in Boston soon. Both sides have already hinted at possible appeals in the future depending on which way the court goes.